The authorities in India are envisaging to have a new parliament building by 2022 at Delhi, on completion of 75 years of independence.The latest design which is in the last stages of finalization includes a new triangular parliament building along with redeveloping the three kilometers long central vista.The current 100 years old unique circular parliament building will be retained as a museum.
It was King George V in 1911 who decided to shift the capital of colonial India-seat of Government- from Calcutta to Delhi.It was also decided to go for new Government buildings as appropriate to show case- for Indian natives than others- the might of colonial India, the erstwhile jewel of the British crown!They were eager to impress the Indian public with British superiority in science, art and civilization!Edwin Lutyens emerged as the chief architect of the project who picked up Herbert Baker, another professional architect and friend of his to complete the challenging task. That was in 1912.But strangely enough much before Lord Erwin,Viceroy opened the complex with much fanfare in 1927, the relationship between the two great architects had turned sour!!They were not even on talking terms till their deaths!!
However the giant, ambitious project was executed as per the detailed master plan which made Delhi proud of few magnificent buildings with European classical architecture, designed to outclass existing Hindu and Mughal structures but few years later came the controversy linked with Chausath Yogini, which still lingers with the parliament building.....that it is inspired from an Indian temple architecture!!It would be interesting to scroll down those anecdotes once again which are not known to most when an independent India celebrates her diamond jubilee of freedom.......
Models of parliament buildings- old and new
The background of selection of design team
Immediately after the decision was made to have a new capital at Delhi, a town planning committee was formed to finalize details on the new city to be emerged.It comprised of Edwin Lutyens as Chief architect,John A Broadie as Chief Engineer and GSC Swinton, an expert on municipal issues as chairman- limited to three members. This committee was approved by the King of England in 1912 with whom the trio had a meeting before proceeding to India. Shajahanabad, a 17th century Mughal city near Delhi was the site for initial consideration which was later replaced to Raisina Hill, a rocky outcrop those days.
It was agreed to pay Lutyens, 5% of the total cost of the mammoth project, which ultimately costed Rupees 13 crores, hundred years back.It was Lutyens who hired the services of Herbert Baker, a professional senior friend of his into the picture.It is understood that the town planning committee had considered Baker before Lutyens as chief but for some unknown reason-almost a mystery- favored Lutyens as chief architect under a condition to hire Baker's services by Lutyens so as to bring rich professional exposures of Baker also into the drawing board.
On the drawing board.....
Both architects were known to have imperialistic outlook- tastes for European design styles over Indian architecture.I don't know how many Indians know the fact that particularly Lutyens looked down on anything Indian- people,culture or architecture.On persuasion of the Viceroy then Lord Hardinge -more could be a political tact than love for India- the architects finally agreed to add few Indian motifs to the buildings designed exclusively otherwise on western classical architecture.Red stone which was Indian, was decided to be used. Indian motifs were limited to perforated screens,eaves, canopies and the like.Elephant heads were placed on pillars.Even some of the motifs of Buddhist pagodas were used.
Lutyens' Bakerloo..
As the designs progressed, the rift in ideas of both architects started surfacing.Baker was known to have in his mind initially a design of equilateral triangle in plan for parliament building.But Lutyens made him change to circular as it looked now.It is interesting to note that the new proposed parliament building is in triangular in shape!!
Lutyens wanted his Government House to be located at the highest point which was atop Raisina Hill so that it would dominate over other buildings where as Baker wanted his Secretariat buildings instead.Baker convinced Lutyens once and got his agreement but later Lutyens regretted his decision and wanted Baker to revoke it.But it never materialized.
Thus as the project progressed the major difference of opinion between them continued to reflect on the gradient of the main vista.As one looks at the Raisina Hill buildings from India Gate, only the dome of Rashtrapati Bhavan- not the main building- is seen as in the photo up.Lutyens wanted to avoid such a scenario at any costs while Baker insisted on it in spite Lutyens approached the King himself!It ended up in a professional ego clash which affected their personal relations-Lutyens' Bakerloo as he noted down later!
Finally the finished city was completed in 1931.The British could use the new facilities only 16 years out of 200 years of their rule as India got the freedom in 1947.Later Nikolaus Pevner, the world famous British architectural historian aptly remarked about it as "Five minutes before closing time!"
Chausath Yogini temple....
Tail Piece...Edwin Lutyens the racist!Emily Lutyens the India lover!!
A bust of Lutyens was erected inside the Viceroy's residence by Lord Mountbatten which is kept as it is in Rashtrapati Bhavan to this day.No doubt Lutyens gave India an excellent world class building but at the same time he was a known racist,I repeat,something Indians may not be aware of.An incorrigible India hater but a gifted architect.I don't know whether it is logical to keep a bust of Lutyens there any more.That is one way of looking at it. A good percentage of Indians themselves were racists among our own society hundred years back!That is another perspective.I would have removed his bust there or anywhere in India for that matter given an opportunity but at the same time kept his name written boldly on a plaque!!You may conclude with your own choice!!
Photos:courtesy HCP Designs/google
However the giant, ambitious project was executed as per the detailed master plan which made Delhi proud of few magnificent buildings with European classical architecture, designed to outclass existing Hindu and Mughal structures but few years later came the controversy linked with Chausath Yogini, which still lingers with the parliament building.....that it is inspired from an Indian temple architecture!!It would be interesting to scroll down those anecdotes once again which are not known to most when an independent India celebrates her diamond jubilee of freedom.......
Models of parliament buildings- old and new
The background of selection of design team
Immediately after the decision was made to have a new capital at Delhi, a town planning committee was formed to finalize details on the new city to be emerged.It comprised of Edwin Lutyens as Chief architect,John A Broadie as Chief Engineer and GSC Swinton, an expert on municipal issues as chairman- limited to three members. This committee was approved by the King of England in 1912 with whom the trio had a meeting before proceeding to India. Shajahanabad, a 17th century Mughal city near Delhi was the site for initial consideration which was later replaced to Raisina Hill, a rocky outcrop those days.
It was agreed to pay Lutyens, 5% of the total cost of the mammoth project, which ultimately costed Rupees 13 crores, hundred years back.It was Lutyens who hired the services of Herbert Baker, a professional senior friend of his into the picture.It is understood that the town planning committee had considered Baker before Lutyens as chief but for some unknown reason-almost a mystery- favored Lutyens as chief architect under a condition to hire Baker's services by Lutyens so as to bring rich professional exposures of Baker also into the drawing board.
On the drawing board.....
It was agreed between the two architects that Lutyens will design Government House- which later became Viceroy's residence and then Rashtrapti Bhavan(President's palace) as known today and overall layout of the city.Baker will design the twin secretariats- South and North blocks- and Council House ( parliament building).
Lutyens' Bakerloo..
As the designs progressed, the rift in ideas of both architects started surfacing.Baker was known to have in his mind initially a design of equilateral triangle in plan for parliament building.But Lutyens made him change to circular as it looked now.It is interesting to note that the new proposed parliament building is in triangular in shape!!
Lutyens wanted his Government House to be located at the highest point which was atop Raisina Hill so that it would dominate over other buildings where as Baker wanted his Secretariat buildings instead.Baker convinced Lutyens once and got his agreement but later Lutyens regretted his decision and wanted Baker to revoke it.But it never materialized.
Thus as the project progressed the major difference of opinion between them continued to reflect on the gradient of the main vista.As one looks at the Raisina Hill buildings from India Gate, only the dome of Rashtrapati Bhavan- not the main building- is seen as in the photo up.Lutyens wanted to avoid such a scenario at any costs while Baker insisted on it in spite Lutyens approached the King himself!It ended up in a professional ego clash which affected their personal relations-Lutyens' Bakerloo as he noted down later!
Finally the finished city was completed in 1931.The British could use the new facilities only 16 years out of 200 years of their rule as India got the freedom in 1947.Later Nikolaus Pevner, the world famous British architectural historian aptly remarked about it as "Five minutes before closing time!"
Chausath Yogini temple....
Did the temple near Gwalior in the state of Madhya Pradesh(MP) inspire the architecture of parliament building by Lutyens and Baker?This temple built in 1055 AD devoted to Lord Shiva by a local dynasty stands loud even today atop a small hill. Chausath means 64 and the outer circular wall has 64 small chambers where as the parliament building has 144 pillars.As it is strikingly similar in looks,many Indians logically think that the temple might have given a spark to the British architects.
I have gone through the historical documents on this issue and found that neither Lutyens or Baker had ever noted down that this temple had inspired them.At the same time European architecture - something Lutyens and Baker had specialized in- never boasted of a circular building of repute other than Colosseum at Rome which was built in 80 AD.
Tail Piece...Edwin Lutyens the racist!Emily Lutyens the India lover!!
A bust of Lutyens was erected inside the Viceroy's residence by Lord Mountbatten which is kept as it is in Rashtrapati Bhavan to this day.No doubt Lutyens gave India an excellent world class building but at the same time he was a known racist,I repeat,something Indians may not be aware of.An incorrigible India hater but a gifted architect.I don't know whether it is logical to keep a bust of Lutyens there any more.That is one way of looking at it. A good percentage of Indians themselves were racists among our own society hundred years back!That is another perspective.I would have removed his bust there or anywhere in India for that matter given an opportunity but at the same time kept his name written boldly on a plaque!!You may conclude with your own choice!!
In this context, I think I cant but write about Emily Lutyens, wife of Edwin Lutyens. Emily happens to be daughter of Robert B lytton, Viceroy Of India 1876-80.While Edwin Lutyens hated anything Indian,strangely enough Emily loved India, Indian culture and mixed with Indians!She was an admirer of J Krishnamurthy,the famous Indian philosopher.She was a friend of Annie Besant and joined her Theosophical Society in 1910.From the fact that Emily became a strict vegetarian shows how much India had influenced her!In 1916 Emily was boldly conducting meetings in her London drawing room, favoring Home Rule Movement of India 1916-18 which set the stage of Independence movement under Annie Besant and Bal Gangadhar Tilak , much ahead of Gandhi who came to the scene much later.
It is a non pardonable, paradoxical irony that Indians have forgotten Emily Lutyens completely, while the bust of Edwin Lutyens is kept in the President's Palace!!
Photos:courtesy HCP Designs/google
G KUTTY: A matter of fact write up..Good!
ReplyDeleteJOPEN :Have studied in history classes about these buildings bout not in detail.Thank you for the detailed info.
ReplyDeleteNAIR: ππ
ReplyDeleteYou're excavating knowledge on the subject is distinctive. Appreciable indeed and my salute to you.
ReplyDeleteMY OBSERVATIONS:
1. I think Yogini Temple's architectural excellence might have definitely influenced Edwin Luteyens to glorify his construction.
2. It is an undisputed fact Luteyens gave India an immaculate, excellent and exhilarating building laced with Architectural ecstasy. In view of this, I feel Lutyene is to be recognized and remembered. Of course, Emly Luteyens is also to be remembered for her invaluable contribution at various levels......NAIR
SHOBHA MURALI:Very informative....had heard Arnab Godwami of Republic TV refer to Lutyens group in Delhi with their noses up in the air but never knew the entire story....Thank you Jaison
ReplyDeleteVery informative and details that I never knew or appreciated. Thank you Sir.
ReplyDeleteExcellent....
ReplyDeleteNAINA NIMBALKAR: Very interesting and informative!Lutyens is made famous more by the lobby which Arnab keeps yelling about.
ReplyDeleteJEYESH MEHTA:
ReplyDeleteI read the post.....did not know the history of these structural till today!!I believe that Lutyens bust should be removed ....still surprised as to why we still have the Mughal and the British era names etched in many places....
ππΌπ REEBA THOMAS
ReplyDeleteTHOMAS ABRAHAM :Excellent!
ReplyDeleteWell selected topic to muse...on
ReplyDeleteJOMY JOSEPH
Mr Jaison Chacko has once again surprised all with his new unique subject of the architectural history of the Indian parliament and Rashtrapati Bhavan. As usual his blogs are a result of intensive and sincere research which makes reading an intellectual treat. Though Lutyens or Baker , had they been alive today would not have accepted the influence of Indian Architecture, still it is standing tall to prove otherwise, that it has been heavily influenced by the Chausath temple of Madhya pradesh. The hegemony between the chief architect Lutyens and Baker has been nicely described by him which makes an interesting reading. He is not hiding his nationalistic spirit when he writes about his anguish of keeping his statue, Lutyens being a racist and anti Indian spirit . On the other hand he remembers and lauds Lutyens wife who loved India very much to the extent of being a party for Indian independence struggle alongside Annie Besant and Balagangadhar Tilak, even though she was a daughter of a former viceroy to India. Finally when we are planning to build a new parliament to show case our pride and prestige and that too probably in a triangular shape this article is very much timely and worth reading. Due to the fear of space limiting my comments. KAILASNATHAN
ReplyDeleteWell researched article.Well written!! R MADHAVANKUTTY
ReplyDeletekramp
ReplyDeleteJaisonchettan, I really appreciate your patience to go deep into history, even though you are not a historian. Well written article.
ReplyDeleteJaison has reminded the history of parliament building built during British rule.President’s building, North block , south block etc were built by architects getting inspiration from Indian architecture. Our temples and palaces are monuments which surprised architects world over even today. Ajantha caves and Ellora temples inAurangabad, and a number of other temples in various states mainly carved from solid rock thousands of years ago remain as surprises even today . Jaison’s writings are relevant now when new parliament building got constructed and from parliamentarians assemble there π
ReplyDeleteΠΊΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π²Ρ 244 ΠΏΡΠΎ
ReplyDeleteqwik cash loans
ReplyDeletehttps://subdomainfinder.c99.nl/scans/2023-12-19/master-water.ru
ReplyDeleteΠΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΠΠΠΠ‘ ΠΠ Π: ΠΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅Ρ Π²ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠ±ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ! ΠΠ°ΠΊΡΠΏΠΊΠ°Π±ΡΠΈΡΠ²Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠΌ, Π½Π°ΡΠΈ Π±ΡΠΈΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Ρ ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΌΠ΅Ρ-Π»Π΅Π·Π²ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅, Π½ΠΎ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ Π½Π°ΠΏΡΡΠΌΡΡ ΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Ρ. ΠΡΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΡΠΏΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ, DIVIS PRO POWER5+1 ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΠΌ! ΠΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π½Ρ Π½Π° Π²ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠΊΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π³Π΄Π° Π² Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ. DIVIS PRO, ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡ ΡΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈ Π±ΡΠΈΡΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ Gillette, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ Gillette Fusion Power.ΠΡΡΡΠΏΠ°ΠΉΡΠ΅ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡ Π΄ΡΡΠΆΠ½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ°Π½Π΄Ρ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΉΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Ρ Π² ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠΈΡΡΡ.
ReplyDeleteΠΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ, Π΄ΡΡΠ·ΡΡ! Π₯ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΡ Ρ Π²Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π°Ρ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΠΉ - Π³Π°Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π΅ΠΉ Ρ 77 ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠΊ Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΌ Π·ΠΈΠΌΠ½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΡΡΠΎΠΌ! ΠΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Ρ ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ Π°ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Π±ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ»Π°. Π― ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ°Π»ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠΎ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ Π½Π°Π»ΡΠ±ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ! Π ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠ΅ Π»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π΅, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ»ΠΊΠ΅ https://douo.ru/otkrytka-s-dobrym-zimnim-utrom/. Π Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄ΡΡ Π²Π°ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΉΡΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ Π³Π°Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π·ΠΈΠΌΠ½Π΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅! ΠΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ΅, Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΆΠ°Π»Π΅Π΅ΡΠ΅!
ReplyDeleteΠΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΠ° Π² ΠΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠ½Π΅
ReplyDeleteΠ―, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΈΠ³ΡΠΎΠΊ, Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π» Π±Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΈΠΌ ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΎΠΌ Π² ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π΅Ρ-ΠΊΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ½ΠΎ ΠΠ°Π²Π°Π΄Π°. Π‘ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π° ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅ΠΊ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ±Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ - ΡΡΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ»ΡΠΊΠΎ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ², ΠΈ Ρ ΡΠΆΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ» Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΠ°Π²Π°Π΄Π°. Π ΡΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΆΠ΅, ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊΡΡΠΏΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΌΠΌΡ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ Π²ΡΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π² ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΠ°Ρ . ΠΠ»Ρ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠ² Π·Π΄Π΅ΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½ ΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΠΏΠΈΠ½Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³Π°Π΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠΈΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ Π±ΡΡΡΡΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ, ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ, ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠ½ΠΎ. ΠΠ½Π΅ Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ ΡΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π²ΡΠΈΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΌΠΌΡ. ΠΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΡΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ³ΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΠ°Π²Π°Π΄Π°, ΠΈ Ρ Ρ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄ΡΡ Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π»ΡΠ±ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌ Π°Π·Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΈΠ³Ρ. ΠΡΠ»ΠΈ Π²Ρ Ρ ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΡΡΡ Ρ ΠΠ°Π²Π°Π΄Π°, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ»ΠΊΠ΅ Π²Π°Π²Π°Π΄Π° Π·Π΅ΡΠΊΠ°Π»ΠΎ vavadaoffsite2.
ReplyDeleteΠΌΠ°Π³Π°Π·ΠΈΠ½ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ²
ReplyDeleteΠΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΡ Π±ΡΠΈΡΠ²Ρ gillette ΠΊΡΠΏΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ± ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Ρ. ΠΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° Π±ΡΠΈΡΠ²Ρ Π΄ΠΆΠΈΠ»Π΅Ρ ΡΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΠΉΠ΄. Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Π΄Π»Ρ Π±ΡΠΈΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΌΠ΅Ρ-Π»Π΅Π·Π²ΠΈΠ΅ fusion ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°Π±ΠΎΡΡ gillette ΠΊΡΠΏΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Ρ. Π‘ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠΏΠΈΡΡ Π»Π΅Π·Π²ΠΈΡ gillette mach3, ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΊΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ Π±ΡΠΈΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΆΠΈΠ»Π»Π΅Ρ ΡΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Ρ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π»ΡΠ±ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΉΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΆΠΈΠ»Π΅Ρ ΠΌΠ°ΠΊ 3 ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ!. Π₯ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΆ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠΈΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΊΠΈ gillette venus.
ReplyDeletehttps://narkologicheskaya-pomoshch-msk.ru
ReplyDeletehttps://oknavnovgorode.ru/okna-dlya-doma/
ReplyDeletehttps://remont-okon-sam.ru
ReplyDeleteΠΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ, Π΄ΡΡΠ·ΡΡ! Π₯ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΡ Ρ Π²Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠΎΠΌ, Π³Π΄Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π³ΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ Π½ΠΎΡΡ. ΠΠ΄Π΅ΡΡ Π²Ρ Π½Π°ΠΉΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ Π°Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π΅ΡΡΡ Π²Π°Ρ Π² ΠΌΠΈΡ Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Π±ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ. Π§ΡΠΎΠ±Ρ ΡΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π³ΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΡΠ»ΠΊΠ΅ https://cojo.ru/gifki/skachat-krasivye-gifki-krasivaya-noch/. ΠΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΠΊΡΠ½ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² Π°ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΡ Π½ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π΅Π±Π° ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π³ΠΈΡΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ Ρ Π΄ΡΡΠ·ΡΡΠΌΠΈ. ΠΡΠΈΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ°!
ReplyDeleteΠΠ° VitaHemp.ru Π²Ρ Π½Π°ΠΉΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΏΠ»ΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π²ΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π²Π°ΠΌ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΠ΅ Π² Π²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ³Π°ΡΠΈΡΡ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π°ΠΌΠΈ. ΠΠ΄Π΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ Π΄ΠΎΠ±Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² Ρ Π»Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·Π΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ, ΡΠ°Π»Π°ΡΡ ΠΈ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°, ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°Ρ Π²Π°Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠ³ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ.
ReplyDelete